[1.51+] Using Network Cables (for dummies)
#21
Posted 21 March 2013 - 05:17 AM
#22
Posted 21 March 2013 - 05:30 AM
#23
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:30 AM
#24
Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:07 AM
TheOriginalBIT, on 21 March 2013 - 05:30 AM, said:
Technically anonymous functions are slower than declared/local ones, as I've read in an experiment on methods of optimization in lua.
http://web.archive.o.../LuaPerformance
Using the wayback machine because the website is down, unfortunately.
#25
Posted 21 March 2013 - 03:06 PM
Kingdaro, on 21 March 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:
http://web.archive.o.../LuaPerformance
#26
Posted 21 March 2013 - 04:57 PM
Kingdaro, on 21 March 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:
TheOriginalBIT, on 21 March 2013 - 05:30 AM, said:
Technically anonymous functions are slower than declared/local ones, as I've read in an experiment on methods of optimization in lua.
http://web.archive.o.../LuaPerformance
Using the wayback machine because the website is down, unfortunately.
Of course they were actually comparing "create a function one million times" to "create a function once and read a local variable one million times", so it wasn't a stupid test.
#27
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:30 PM
Kingdaro, on 20 March 2013 - 09:42 AM, said:
#28
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:38 PM
PixelToast, on 21 March 2013 - 05:09 AM, said:
anyway, your code is broken in so many ways
parallel.waitForAll( function() shell.run("disk/test") end, function() shell.run("disk/test2") end )
Not wrong, just personal preference.
TheOriginalBIT, on 21 March 2013 - 04:53 AM, said:
Angry1987, on 21 March 2013 - 04:38 AM, said:
i will starts 2 programs from 1 computer,here the startup:
shell.run("disk/test" and "disk/test2")test first line
m = peripheral.wrap("monitor_5")test2 first line
m = peripheral.wrap("monitor_6")but 1 program only starts on monitor_6
local function run1() shell.run("disk/test") end local function run2() shell.run("disk/test2") end parallel.waitForAny( run1, run2 )
Did probably just want both to finish. waitForAll
Both ways are completely correct.
PS Both of your usernames are awesome.
#29
Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:43 AM
#30
Posted 25 March 2013 - 03:37 AM
#31
Posted 31 March 2013 - 10:28 AM
#32
Posted 31 March 2013 - 11:17 AM
slango20, on 31 March 2013 - 10:28 AM, said:
The process of mod updating:
Minecraft updates
A few days later, Forge is ready for a release.
A while later, you're ready to update your mod.
Multiply that by all the mods in FTB.
Then you need to update config and whatnot.
Then FTB updates.
Factor in human procrastination and laziness, and it makes perfect sense.
#33
Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:54 AM
#35
Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:11 PM
...as soon as I upgrade to 1.5. Forgot I'm waiting for RP to update...
#36
Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:23 PM
amtra5, on 25 March 2013 - 01:43 AM, said:
#37
Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:42 PM
#38
#39
Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:56 PM
At that point the computer would have to simply break the connection.
To be fair, I usually have my computers connected through the back, but in an office setting where you don't want workers overwriting your antivirus system, you would probably have a bunch of wires running through the ceiling.
#40
Posted 04 April 2013 - 03:35 AM
What will be detected by right computer (your screenshot but without modems) on left side? Computer or monitor?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users