thank you BigSHinyToys you code works.
it really helps alot.
wired redent repeter for fireworlf?
Started by NoLongerUsed, Apr 17 2013 07:17 AM
27 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 19 April 2013 - 06:29 AM
#22
Posted 19 April 2013 - 06:47 AM
BigSHinyToys code error:
if you use more then 1 repeater it stops working.
if you use more then 1 repeater it stops working.
#23
Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:05 AM
mtwiscool, on 19 April 2013 - 06:47 AM, said:
BigSHinyToys code error:
if you use more then 1 repeater it stops working.
if you use more then 1 repeater it stops working.
[EDIT]
I tested this through 4 routers and it worked for me.
[/EDIT]
#24
Posted 19 April 2013 - 08:08 AM
i tried adding rednet.broadcast line and it gave a error code:
expected <name>
expected <name>
#25
Posted 19 April 2013 - 11:03 AM
Why isn't anyone (Other than Dlcruz) listening to me? JUST USE GIANT REDNET TOWERS. gosh, you don't need to use cables.
#26
Posted 19 April 2013 - 11:43 AM
cables are more realistic
as it home connection for smp not mobile connections
as it home connection for smp not mobile connections
#27
Posted 19 April 2013 - 02:02 PM
^
False, do you get your internet via LAN or Wifi, meaning wireless internet, and last time I check wireless meant no wires.... so no LAN. If you think when you make a world on minecraft and make a LAN server, you are not really making it LAN, but allowing other computers in your own network to join, same with how pocket addition network works. Either way though, the Towers is a better way since you do not need to make a weird program to read them, but have them send data through the bottom receiving computers, to the top computer at the top of the tower, so then it may broadcast a signal. Still you can use LAN, but having those Towers would be the more realistic thing.
False, do you get your internet via LAN or Wifi, meaning wireless internet, and last time I check wireless meant no wires.... so no LAN. If you think when you make a world on minecraft and make a LAN server, you are not really making it LAN, but allowing other computers in your own network to join, same with how pocket addition network works. Either way though, the Towers is a better way since you do not need to make a weird program to read them, but have them send data through the bottom receiving computers, to the top computer at the top of the tower, so then it may broadcast a signal. Still you can use LAN, but having those Towers would be the more realistic thing.
#28
Posted 20 April 2013 - 02:18 AM
most isps use cables all the way to the custmers routor
making cable more realitic then wireless
anyway this thred was not about witch one is better but the coding for a wired repeater
making cable more realitic then wireless
anyway this thred was not about witch one is better but the coding for a wired repeater
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











