I think we want WYSIWYG
1
Is MediaWiki too hard to use?
Started by yaaay, May 09 2013 05:55 AM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 May 2013 - 05:55 AM
#2
Posted 09 May 2013 - 05:58 AM
MediaWiki is perfectly fine for us - Wikipedia uses (practically) the same software. Anything else is too weak or has issues with things like templates, dynamic content and edit tracking.
#3
Posted 09 May 2013 - 08:03 AM
WYSIWYG editors are always really finicky and unpredictable. Using a regular plain-text editor allows you to see the code behind the page you're creating/posting.
#4
Posted 09 May 2013 - 08:44 AM
Kingdaro, on 09 May 2013 - 08:03 AM, said:
WYSIWYG editors are always really finicky and unpredictable. Using a regular plain-text editor allows you to see the code behind the page you're creating/posting.
#5
Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:00 PM
The IntegratedRedstone wiki for Redpower was on Wikispaces, which has a WYSIWYG editor. Editing was HORRIBLE. Then Danol started a MediaWiki-based wiki for Redpower, which is now the only thing I edit because it’s not painful.
#6
Posted 18 May 2013 - 11:31 PM
If I like Wysiwyg wt do i do
#8
Posted 23 May 2013 - 10:57 AM
Would this be good?
#9
Posted 23 May 2013 - 06:43 PM
I shall make a clientside wysiwyg mediawiki editor
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users