#1
Posted 18 May 2013 - 09:50 PM
#2
Posted 18 May 2013 - 09:51 PM
#3
Posted 18 May 2013 - 09:54 PM
#4
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:01 PM
Here are screenshots of both:
Desktop
Start Screen
#5
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:06 PM
And yeah, W8 isn't really that bad. It's better than 7 imo. I prefer more simplistic interfaces and themes. I refer to both the Metro UI and the desktop theme. Plus, having an updated version of windows is generally better in the longrun for software compatibility and support.
#6
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:17 PM
#7
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:40 PM
#8
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:43 PM
Never used any form of Unix system and I'm unlikely to any time soon. It's not that I don't like them, it's just that It would be too much effort and right now I have more important things to do. Plus I don't want to have to run C# through Mono or get the Linux versions of the programs I have, it's just effort.
I will use Linux someday when I can afford a better computer for my main stuff and a secondary netbook for Linux.
#9
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:46 PM
#10
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:55 PM
ETHANATOR360, on 18 May 2013 - 09:50 PM, said:
So it could in theory run code written in any language.
#11
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:57 PM
#12
Posted 18 May 2013 - 11:58 PM
#14
Posted 19 May 2013 - 12:14 AM
#16
Posted 19 May 2013 - 12:31 AM
Pharap, on 19 May 2013 - 12:14 AM, said:
That and, unfortunately, internet forums are often not places in which people recognize the universal law of "to each his" own when it comes to preferences and other subjective matters.
Dat internet.
#17
Posted 19 May 2013 - 01:05 AM
Grim Reaper, on 19 May 2013 - 12:31 AM, said:
Pharap, on 19 May 2013 - 12:14 AM, said:
That and, unfortunately, internet forums are often not places in which people recognize the universal law of "to each his" own when it comes to preferences and other subjective matters.
Dat internet.
I would hope that everyone here is just about civilised enough to accept such a rule if the thread creator instated it as a rule.
I'm being optimistic about human nature for once, I say we allow the rule on those grounds alone lol
#18
Posted 19 May 2013 - 01:20 AM
Kingdaro, on 18 May 2013 - 10:06 PM, said:
Pharap, on 18 May 2013 - 10:55 PM, said:
#19
Posted 19 May 2013 - 01:31 AM
#20
Posted 19 May 2013 - 03:09 AM
theoriginalbit, on 19 May 2013 - 01:20 AM, said:
And therein lies the 'in theory' part of my statement.
Although if someone made a bytecode translator, they could make other languages or bytecode convert to Dalvik bytecode (obviously permitting for missing features such as function pointers, unless the Dalvik VM can emulate their functionality. Last time I checked, it couldn't).
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users