Jump to content




Why refer to Rednet as a "wrapper" of Channels? It's much more useful than that!


  • You cannot reply to this topic
22 replies to this topic

#21 D3matt

  • Members
  • 830 posts

Posted 30 May 2013 - 05:11 PM

The new rednet API just uses the return channel as the computer ID, right? In which case one can easily just use the modem API to impersonate a computer.

#22 Shazz

  • Members
  • 175 posts

Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:32 PM

View PostCranium, on 30 May 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:

Rednet does definitely still work. Rednet via bundled cables, however, does not.
When I said that it does not work internally, I meant that the sending/receiving messages are not handled by the mod itself (Java part) instead it's just a API that utilizes the modem API. Sorry for being unclear.

#23 Mads

  • Members
  • 604 posts
  • LocationCopenhagen, Denmark

Posted 01 June 2013 - 03:18 AM

Because it is a wrapper.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users