16 replies to this topic

[Sxw]

Best. IDE. Ever.

http://www.chris-gra...com/lighttable/

[Zudo]

This looks awesome!

[Tjakka5]

Someone, make LighttableCraft mod...
NOW!

[TheOddByte]

Oohh! I'm going to try out the alpha!

[M4sh3dP0t4t03]

Looks nice! I just hope that people will make good plug-ins for most languages.

[nutcase84]

Awwww.... It's not for PPC. ;(

[Sxw]

nutcase84, on 13 July 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:

Awwww.... It's not for PPC. ;(

How old is your computer O.o?

[nutcase84]

Sxw, on 13 July 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

nutcase84, on 13 July 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:

Awwww.... It's not for PPC. ;(

How old is your computer O.o?

I have a desktop with Windows 7... but my laptop is a Apple Powerbook G4 15" 2005 1.5gh 70gb HD and 1gb of memory. It's old, but it does it's job.

Will someone port this to PPC?

[Sxw]

Should be simple as recompiling to PPC. Ill try.
/me searches for source.

EDIT:

It's build on node-WebKit... So... Uhhh... I dunno.

EDIT:

Are you running 10.6? If so, compile node webkit yourself and replace the binary on the .app

Good luck.

[1lann]

I don't think you can just compile programs to be in a different architecture... If you really could, why not compile chromium to be 64 bit on windows so you won't have that stupid java problem? xD

Anywho, thanks for sharing this sxw

Quick note to ubuntu (13.04) users, if you can't run LightTable (and you get a libudev.so missing shared library error when you try to run LightTable in terminal) the try this command in terminal

sudo ln -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 /usr/lib/libudev.so.0

The problem actually is, the libudev library location is different than what LightTable thought, so that just does a hacky symbolic link from where libudev actually is to where LightTable thinks it is.

[Pharap]

Not quite as good as Visual Studio, but I'd argue it's definitely better than Code::Blocks.

[Mads]

The tabbing is retarded. It just adds four spaces. That's basically the reason I'm not using it.

[Mads]

1lann, on 14 July 2013 - 12:47 AM, said:

I don't think you can just compile programs to be in a different architecture... If you really could, why not compile chromium to be 64 bit on windows so you won't have that stupid java problem? xD

Anywho, thanks for sharing this sxw

Quick note to ubuntu (13.04) users, if you can't run LightTable (and you get a libudev.so missing shared library error when you try to run LightTable in terminal) the try this command in terminal

sudo ln -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 /usr/lib/libudev.so.0

The problem actually is, the libudev library location is different than what LightTable thought, so that just does a hacky symbolic link from where libudev actually is to where LightTable thinks it is.

Of course you can. Though, you can't if the code is written for one specific architecture.

[nutcase84]

How can I run 10.6 on PPC?

[Mads]

nutcase84, on 14 July 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:

How can I run 10.6 on PPC?

How about googling?

[lieudusty]

Awesome IDE

[nutcase84]

Mads, on 15 July 2013 - 03:48 AM, said:

nutcase84, on 14 July 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:

How can I run 10.6 on PPC?

How about googling?

I don't think I'm going to run 10.6 in a emulator on my 1.5GH G4... 10.6 is Intel only.