Custom Recipe
#1
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:41 AM
#2
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:53 AM
and on my server we usually replace our door locks with control computers once we can afford them, we still use CC for emails and wireless though
EDIT:
i haz recipie
#3
Posted 07 June 2012 - 07:11 AM
#4
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:33 PM
abc, on 07 June 2012 - 05:53 AM, said:
and on my server we usually replace our door locks with control computers once we can afford them, we still use CC for emails and wireless though
EDIT:
i haz recipie

I have heard of such mods, but it is always nice to have that feature built in. You would also have to deal with another mod and configuring it both client and server side, which can become a pain.
musicgack, on 07 June 2012 - 07:11 AM, said:
#5
Posted 08 June 2012 - 05:07 AM
#6
Posted 08 June 2012 - 09:00 PM
musicgack, on 07 June 2012 - 07:11 AM, said:
you wouldnt need permission from eloramm if you were just using a recipe
if you dont have redpower then it wont do anything because it wont have a rp config to read from
and guess what? ITS OPTIONAL, why you gotta hate on more options?
#7
Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:59 PM
Like with ccSensors or thaumcraft?
Just detect if RP is installed and a new config option called "RedPower Recipes" is enabled
#8
Posted 09 June 2012 - 01:02 AM
#9
Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:15 AM
Bossman201, on 09 June 2012 - 01:02 AM, said:
#10
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:55 AM
#12
#14
Posted 23 June 2012 - 11:34 AM
#15
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:44 AM
For instance, a computer recipie could use a clock and three repeaters (representing a processor and controllable output on the back) instead of just redstone, stone and glass (also, it could use a whole glass block instead of just a single pane). That increases the resource cost significantly without being dependent on another mod.
#16
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:19 AM
ChunLing, on 07 July 2012 - 03:44 AM, said:
For instance, a computer recipie could use a clock and three repeaters (representing a processor and controllable output on the back) instead of just redstone, stone and glass (also, it could use a whole glass block instead of just a single pane). That increases the resource cost significantly without being dependent on another mod.
It doen't have to be RP. When I wrote "Custom Recipe" I meant more "RedPower Recipe" to make it so CC computers relate to RPC's when it comes to resource cost.
#17
Posted 25 July 2012 - 01:26 AM
#18
Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:26 PM
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I sense I'm not the only person who would like to see CC items being a little more expensive to craft than they presently are. I absolutely love Elorams RP computers and the balance they have, but I absolutely love Lua, Turtles and monitors too
On a search, there was a suggestion that dan200 was contemplating introduced alternative recipes that could be switched via a config option (tweet?).... is there any update/news on that? I've not seen anything?
I'm not suggesting spoil it for what is clearly the majority who like cheap crafting and change the recipes across the board - an option for the two would be fine so those that enjoy it the way it is can carry on.
#19
Posted 11 January 2013 - 02:48 AM
brumster, on 10 January 2013 - 11:26 PM, said:
I'd love to see some sort of tech tree to build up the basic computer. Require a circut board, a monitor recipe, RAM, NVRAM (since they don't lose their memory when picked up and don't have an internal disk)
#20
Posted 11 January 2013 - 05:04 AM
I'm not opposed to the recipes being a good bit more expensive, though. But it seems to me like this thread may have died for a reason. Possibly as a result of something I said in my last post, though I'm not sure what.
You know what, though? I'm going to go ahead and expand on the suggestion, and suggest several options for a configurable expensive recipes value. Default would be the normal recipes, then expensive recipes based on more involved minecraft components (clocks, comparators, pistons, dispensers) then RPC equivalence, and then hardcore, where you couldn't craft computers at all, so you'd need to be in creative to get them (this may or may not be a useful option for SMP server operators).
And then, just to be contrary, I'll shoot down this suggestion. Or at least vote against it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











