1697 replies to this topic

[bauen1]

Lignum, on 14 February 2016 - 01:43 PM, said:

ry00000, on 14 February 2016 - 01:37 PM, said:

WAT? there's an address called knoandroid. Who would ever want to NOT use Android?

ARGH.... only 2 MH/s on my PC! 2 minutes have passed and I've not even solved 1 block!!!

PS: what's the size of 1 block?

I'm currently mining block 000000000764.

UPDATE: now getting 2.5 MH/s with all 4 cores.

Which is STILL not good.

You won't have much luck CPU mining. You need at least 500 MH/s, at which point it's still difficult. But no worries, we're working on ways to make getting Krist easier again (mining pools, faucets, etc...). As soon as the GPU miners start coming out, mining will be possible again, too.

For faucets we would need somebody to exchange real money to wrist (could also be the owner himself)
And for mining pool, i don't know about the other 2 people writing one, but mine requires a full rewrite (kinda)
Edit: Is the explorer still there=

Edited by bauen1, 14 February 2016 - 01:54 PM.

[sci4me]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 01:54 PM, said:

Lignum, on 14 February 2016 - 01:43 PM, said:

ry00000, on 14 February 2016 - 01:37 PM, said:

WAT? there's an address called knoandroid. Who would ever want to NOT use Android?

ARGH.... only 2 MH/s on my PC! 2 minutes have passed and I've not even solved 1 block!!!

PS: what's the size of 1 block?

I'm currently mining block 000000000764.

UPDATE: now getting 2.5 MH/s with all 4 cores.

Which is STILL not good.

You won't have much luck CPU mining. You need at least 500 MH/s, at which point it's still difficult. But no worries, we're working on ways to make getting Krist easier again (mining pools, faucets, etc...). As soon as the GPU miners start coming out, mining will be possible again, too.

For faucets we would need somebody to exchange real money to wrist (could also be the owner himself)
And for mining pool, i don't know about the other 2 people writing one, but mine requires a full rewrite (kinda)
Edit: Is the explorer still there=

As for faucets, they don't require real money...
As for pools, me and yevano wrote one but it's kinda outdated now. Not sure if anyone else is gonna write one or if we will...
The online explorer is gone.

[ry00000]

Well then why did I get 250 kst all of a sudden?

[sci4me]

ry00000, on 14 February 2016 - 01:57 PM, said:

Well then why did I get 250 kst all of a sudden?

that was me

[bauen1]

Only gonna take 4 hours for me to get a block YAY
So if people would buy ads using krist faucets would work without real money?

[Lignum]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 03:47 PM, said:

Only gonna take 4 hours for me to get a block YAY

The work had a digit added to it . It should be a lot easier now. Though if you don't have a GPU miner, you're probably still better off doing stuff like participating in the lottery since the block reward is currently 12KST.

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 03:47 PM, said:

So if people would buy ads using krist faucets would work without real money?

Well, I'm writing one and currently it works purely based on donations from generous people. No real money involved.

[Lemmmy]

The online explorer is gone, but it will be replaced by the new web wallet.

[3d6]

The online explorer was for my private use anyways, it was definitely not a quality tool

Edited by 3d6, 14 February 2016 - 04:08 PM.

[bauen1]

3d6, on 14 February 2016 - 04:08 PM, said:

The online explorer was for my private use anyways, it was definitely not a quality tool

Guess what it still looked better and was faster than the CC variant.

Lignum, on 14 February 2016 - 03:52 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 03:47 PM, said:

Only gonna take 4 hours for me to get a block YAY

The work had a digit added to it . It should be a lot easier now. Though if you don't have a GPU miner, you're probably still better off doing stuff like participating in the lottery since the block reward is currently 12KST.

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 03:47 PM, said:

So if people would buy ads using krist faucets would work without real money?

Well, I'm writing one and currently it works purely based on donations from generous people. No real money involved.

Would love to try that.

So is anybody still working on a mining pool?

Edited by bauen1, 14 February 2016 - 04:27 PM.

[Lemmmy]

The backend is pretty much complete for KFaucet, it just needs a nice looking frontend, which I'll supply.

Also, look what I just found lying around on my hard drive:

Spoiler

Edited by Lemmmy, 14 February 2016 - 04:25 PM.

[bauen1]

Wait aren't there some API calls missing for the names part? (Im currently making them all available in nodejs)
Because i can't see a way to get the A record of a name.

[sci4me]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 05:54 PM, said:

Wait aren't there some API calls missing for the names part? (Im currently making them all available in nodejs)
Because i can't see a way to get the A record of a name.

It appears you're right. Seems like the only way to do that currently is to get all of the names. When you GET /names, they come with the a value. But you're right that this should probably be added.

However, if the old API had it, you can still use that call. The old API is still supported.

[bauen1]

sci4me, on 14 February 2016 - 05:59 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 05:54 PM, said:

Wait aren't there some API calls missing for the names part? (Im currently making them all available in nodejs)
Because i can't see a way to get the A record of a name.

It appears you're right. Seems like the only way to do that currently is to get all of the names. When you GET /names, they come with the a value. But you're right that this should probably be added.

However, if the old API had it, you can still use that call. The old API is still supported.

Yeah it might be better to keep it on the old api anyway.

[sci4me]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 06:00 PM, said:

sci4me, on 14 February 2016 - 05:59 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 05:54 PM, said:

Wait aren't there some API calls missing for the names part? (Im currently making them all available in nodejs)
Because i can't see a way to get the A record of a name.

It appears you're right. Seems like the only way to do that currently is to get all of the names. When you GET /names, they come with the a value. But you're right that this should probably be added.

However, if the old API had it, you can still use that call. The old API is still supported.

Yeah it might be better to keep it on the old api anyway.

I mean, it would probably make sense to add a call for that to the new API.

[Quartz101]

Can you create a little tutorial on making a basic miner, please?

[Lemmmy]

sci4me, on 14 February 2016 - 05:59 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 05:54 PM, said:

Wait aren't there some API calls missing for the names part? (Im currently making them all available in nodejs)
Because i can't see a way to get the A record of a name.

It appears you're right. Seems like the only way to do that currently is to get all of the names. When you GET /names, they come with the a value. But you're right that this should probably be added.

However, if the old API had it, you can still use that call. The old API is still supported.

Looks like I accidentally removed /names/:name during a refactor. It has been added now.

Edited by Lemmmy, 14 February 2016 - 06:18 PM.

[bauen1]

Quartz101, on 14 February 2016 - 06:03 PM, said:

Can you create a little tutorial on making a basic miner, please?

There is a lua miner somewhere in this thread.
Edit: i just commited a syncnode api for nodejs (client side) on my mining pool if anybody wants to use it. (Untested tho!!)
Edit: I actually mined a block with only 0,5MH/s
Edit: You can't pass 0 as offset to List latest blocks ??

Edited by bauen1, 14 February 2016 - 07:05 PM.

[Lemmmy]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 06:26 PM, said:

Edit: You can't pass 0 as offset to List latest blocks ??

Fixed.

Edited by Lemmmy, 14 February 2016 - 07:13 PM.

[bauen1]

Lemmmy, on 14 February 2016 - 07:12 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 06:26 PM, said:

Edit: You can't pass 0 as offset to List latest blocks ??

Fixed.

Lol i passed 0 as limit wich i guess should not be done ( It just uses 50 )

Edited by bauen1, 14 February 2016 - 07:18 PM.

[Lemmmy]

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 07:17 PM, said:

Lemmmy, on 14 February 2016 - 07:12 PM, said:

bauen1, on 14 February 2016 - 06:26 PM, said:

Edit: You can't pass 0 as offset to List latest blocks ??

Fixed.

Lol i passed 0 as limit wich i guess should not be done ( It just uses 50 )

Yeah, 0 is and will remain an invalid limit. ?offset=0 should now work though!