1697 replies to this topic

[Xerxes]

What address would you like the stolen coins sent to, Yevano?

[Yevano]

Thanks for being honest . Send them to kevbyrm7pi, please. Out of curiosity, how long did it take to crack it, were you targeting my address specifically, and what kind of attack did you use?

[Xerxes]

Yevano, on 14 May 2015 - 04:35 PM, said:

Thanks for being honest . Send them to kevbyrm7pi, please. Out of curiosity, how long did it take to crack it, were you targeting my address specifically, and what kind of attack did you use?

Sent them.

It took about 30 minutes to crack.
I was targetting the top 5 addresses on the Economicon.
The attack I used was a distributed bruteforce attack.

It consisted of 5 NVidia GeForce Titans.

[Tag365]

I need 500 coins in my account.

[Yevano]

Xerxes, on 14 May 2015 - 04:52 PM, said:

Sent them.

It took about 30 minutes to crack.
I was targetting the top 5 addresses on the Economicon.
The attack I used was a distributed bruteforce attack.

It consisted of 5 NVidia GeForce Titans.

Wow, that's some serious computing power you have there! I guess moral of the story is: Use long, randomized passwords. For anyone wondering, my password was 9 characters long, consisting of 7 lowercase alphabet characters followed by 2 digits. Technically, the safest possible password should be a randomized one with 32 characters, utilizing the whole ascii set.

Have you figured out any properties about krist passwords, like if there are more collisions than there should be normally?

[biggest yikes]

Any way to calculate the current amount of krist a solved block will give?

Edited by Atenefyr, 14 May 2015 - 08:27 PM.

[Yevano]

Atenefyr raises a good point. I propose the following API functions:

?getnewdomains
Returns a ; separated list containing new domains which are currently contributing to the block value.

?getdomainvalue=d
Returns the number of blocks left until the KST from the domain d runs out. For example, if the domain has just been purchased and no blocks have been mined, this value should be the cost of the domain.

?getbaseblockvalue
Returns the current base value of a block. // Note, if this is able to be calculated, this is unnecessary.

?getdomainaward
Returns the current amount of extra KST that will be awarded for the next block.

?getblockvalue=b
Returns the amount of KST distributed when block b was mined.

The names might be a bit wonky, but you get the picture.

Edit: My new address is kutlg1kzhz. Unless the addresses are inherently weak, this one should be really well protected.

Edited by Yevano, 14 May 2015 - 08:58 PM.

[3d6]

Yevano, on 14 May 2015 - 08:54 PM, said:

Atenefyr raises a good point. I propose the following API functions:

?getnewdomains
Returns a ; separated list containing new domains which are currently contributing to the block value.

?getdomainvalue=d
Returns the number of blocks left until the KST from the domain d runs out. For example, if the domain has just been purchased and no blocks have been mined, this value should be the cost of the domain.

?getbaseblockvalue
Returns the current base value of a block. // Note, if this is able to be calculated, this is unnecessary.

?getdomainaward
Returns the current amount of extra KST that will be awarded for the next block.

?getblockvalue=b
Returns the amount of KST distributed when block b was mined.

The names might be a bit wonky, but you get the picture.

Edit: My new address is kutlg1kzhz. Unless the addresses are inherently weak, this one should be really well protected.

Done

[biggest yikes]

cossacksson, on 14 May 2015 - 10:40 PM, said:

Yevano, on 14 May 2015 - 08:54 PM, said:

Atenefyr raises a good point. I propose the following API functions:

?getnewdomains
Returns a ; separated list containing new domains which are currently contributing to the block value.

?getdomainvalue=d
Returns the number of blocks left until the KST from the domain d runs out. For example, if the domain has just been purchased and no blocks have been mined, this value should be the cost of the domain.

?getbaseblockvalue
Returns the current base value of a block. // Note, if this is able to be calculated, this is unnecessary.

?getdomainaward
Returns the current amount of extra KST that will be awarded for the next block.

?getblockvalue=b
Returns the amount of KST distributed when block b was mined.

The names might be a bit wonky, but you get the picture.

Edit: My new address is kutlg1kzhz. Unless the addresses are inherently weak, this one should be really well protected.

Done

?getdomainvalue doesn't work. Otherwise, will utilize. Thanks.

[Yevano]

Nice! I think getblockvalue is also bugged, as it always returns 50. Or maybe you just haven't gotten to implement it yet. I reckon it probably requires you to start keeping up with the value, so I'm guessing it won't work with earlier blocks.

[3d6]

Yevano, on 14 May 2015 - 10:59 PM, said:

Nice! I think getblockvalue is also bugged, as it always returns 50. Or maybe you just haven't gotten to implement it yet. I reckon it probably requires you to start keeping up with the value, so I'm guessing it won't work with earlier blocks.

Appears to be working fine
http://ceriat.net/kr...etblockvalue=78
http://ceriat.net/kr...lockvalue=56155
http://ceriat.net/kr...lockvalue=59033
It can't predict the value of future blocks, if that's what you're trying to do

Atenefyr, on 14 May 2015 - 10:54 PM, said:

cossacksson, on 14 May 2015 - 10:40 PM, said:

snip

Done

?getdomainvalue doesn't work. Otherwise, will utilize. Thanks.

I think that's just because the names listed are composed entirely of the character '0' but I haven't tested it because I can't think of another name I want.

Edited by cossacksson, 14 May 2015 - 11:12 PM.

[biggest yikes]

?getnewdomains seems to be bugged aswell (random l's and 0's)

[3d6]

Atenefyr, on 14 May 2015 - 11:15 PM, said:

?getnewdomains seems to be bugged aswell (random l's and 0's)

Those are actual names that people are paying for
I think llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.kst will be the best site ever.
In all seriousness, I'm considering making the maximum length of a name like 16 instead of 64. Who the hell wants to type out a 64 character name?!

edit: Done for now, unless there are any objections. I don't see why anyone would care to want such a long name. 24 char max

edit 2: Suddenly decided to wait until KristWallet 12, so that the UI will prevent registration attempts of illegally long names

Edited by cossacksson, 14 May 2015 - 11:24 PM.

[Yevano]

I registered the long one to test the max length . Also it appears I was using ?getblockvalue incorrectly. I was giving it the block answer rather than the block height. Seems to work fine.

[biggest yikes]

cossacksson, on 14 May 2015 - 11:19 PM, said:

Suddenly decided to wait until KristWallet 12

On the topic of KW 12 and KristScape, any info about kristscape's pre-release?

[realgogogoluke]

Anyone have any GPU miners that work with AMD? Would like to mine faster.

[Xerxes]

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 12:32 AM, said:

Anyone have any GPU miners that work with AMD? Would like to mine faster.

If you want a miner that uses your GPU and is card independent, I recommend checking out "LWJGL".

While I'm at it, I feel bad about litterally wasting the difficulty yesterday, so I'm going to put 60k straight into random domains.

[realgogogoluke]

Xerxes, on 15 May 2015 - 01:13 AM, said:

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 12:32 AM, said:

Anyone have any GPU miners that work with AMD? Would like to mine faster.

If you want a miner that uses your GPU and is card independent, I recommend checking out "LWJGL".

While I'm at it, I feel bad about litterally wasting the difficulty yesterday, so I'm going to put 60k straight into random domains.

That's not a miner though, it's a java library.

[Xerxes]

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 01:41 AM, said:

Xerxes, on 15 May 2015 - 01:13 AM, said:

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 12:32 AM, said:

Anyone have any GPU miners that work with AMD? Would like to mine faster.

If you want a miner that uses your GPU and is card independent, I recommend checking out "LWJGL".

While I'm at it, I feel bad about litterally wasting the difficulty yesterday, so I'm going to put 60k straight into random domains.

That's not a miner though, it's a java library.

I'm aware of that.
I was recommending that you use LWJGL for your GPU related tasks when making a miner.
Because it utilizes OpenGL, it is widely supported for both AMD and Nvidia.

[realgogogoluke]

Xerxes, on 15 May 2015 - 02:05 AM, said:

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 01:41 AM, said:

Xerxes, on 15 May 2015 - 01:13 AM, said:

realgogogoluke, on 15 May 2015 - 12:32 AM, said:

Anyone have any GPU miners that work with AMD? Would like to mine faster.

If you want a miner that uses your GPU and is card independent, I recommend checking out "LWJGL".

While I'm at it, I feel bad about litterally wasting the difficulty yesterday, so I'm going to put 60k straight into random domains.

That's not a miner though, it's a java library.

I'm aware of that.
I was recommending that you use LWJGL for your GPU related tasks when making a miner.
Because it utilizes OpenGL, it is widely supported for both AMD and Nvidia.

Welp, time to learn Java.