Which method for transmitting is better?
#1
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:19 AM
#2
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:38 AM
#3
Posted 03 July 2015 - 05:38 AM
Modem api gives you more control over what is going on in the background ex: what channel will be used.
Edited by valithor, 03 July 2015 - 05:42 AM.
#4
Posted 03 July 2015 - 08:28 AM
just do a peripheral.wrap() to the modem, and after modem.transmit(Channel,ReplyChannel,MESSAGE). And receive computer must be open on the channel with Modem.open(CHANNEL).... And you can put at frequence from 0 to around 60 000
#6
Posted 03 July 2015 - 12:32 PM
valithor, on 03 July 2015 - 05:38 AM, said:
Modem api gives you more control over what is going on in the background ex: what channel will be used.
#7
Posted 03 July 2015 - 12:39 PM
TechMasterGeneral, on 03 July 2015 - 12:32 PM, said:
valithor, on 03 July 2015 - 05:38 AM, said:
Modem api gives you more control over what is going on in the background ex: what channel will be used.
The problem with that then is if I wanted to hack your system, I just have an extra step to get your channel. Other than run time encryption, there is little you can do security wise.
#8
Posted 03 July 2015 - 12:43 PM
Lupus590, on 03 July 2015 - 12:39 PM, said:
TechMasterGeneral, on 03 July 2015 - 12:32 PM, said:
valithor, on 03 July 2015 - 05:38 AM, said:
Modem api gives you more control over what is going on in the background ex: what channel will be used.
The problem with that then is if I wanted to hack your system, I just have an extra step to get your channel. Other than run time encryption, there is little you can do security wise.
#9
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:17 PM
TechMasterGeneral, on 03 July 2015 - 12:43 PM, said:
The problem is I can read your program and re-engineer it's encryption/decryption parts for malicious use and fetch the key from your server. The way to prevent this is to use byte code but that is not allowed on the forums ("malicious code smuggling" as I call it).
The only 2 key system I know of from encryption is public key if you can get that working, you should be safer, just have the user make there own private key.
Note: CC doesn't lend itself well to security, also I'm no expert on encryption.
Also: Why does a chat program need encryption?
My solution to my theoretical needs of preventing my CC data being read is to bit shift it a number of times. Although that is more to prevent my code from trying to understand another systems rednet chatter. (My theoretical scenario is in my Hive system, sending data to turtles [we are likely not going to do it this way though, this idea was from ages ago])
Edited by Lupus590, 03 July 2015 - 03:18 PM.
#10
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:36 PM
#11
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:07 PM
Lupus590, on 03 July 2015 - 03:17 PM, said:
TechMasterGeneral, on 03 July 2015 - 12:43 PM, said:
The problem is I can read your program and re-engineer it's encryption/decryption parts for malicious use and fetch the key from your server. The way to prevent this is to use byte code but that is not allowed on the forums ("malicious code smuggling" as I call it).
The only 2 key system I know of from encryption is public key if you can get that working, you should be safer, just have the user make there own private key.
Note: CC doesn't lend itself well to security, also I'm no expert on encryption.
Also: Why does a chat program need encryption?
My solution to my theoretical needs of preventing my CC data being read is to bit shift it a number of times. Although that is more to prevent my code from trying to understand another systems rednet chatter. (My theoretical scenario is in my Hive system, sending data to turtles [we are likely not going to do it this way though, this idea was from ages ago])
Yeah people being able to read the program is a risk I'm going to have to take. But like I said its more proof of concept.
#12
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:51 PM
#13
Posted 03 July 2015 - 05:14 PM
Have a look at other encryption posts of the forums for more tips.
#14
Posted 06 July 2015 - 05:55 PM
I think that will be the easiest and securest methode for me for my "big nuclear reactor"-project, coz i need to use multiple wireless-network connections but dont want to add hardcoded encryption-keys..
I think i cant code DH myself
Ive found this: http://www.computerc...s-various-apis/
but im not sure if it will work.. ?
Edited by meigrafd, 06 July 2015 - 06:00 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users