47 replies to this topic

[Anavrins]

LoganDark, on 14 December 2015 - 03:52 AM, said:

You could've just told me what to improve and what to add, but instead, you chose to offend me...

Told you to add what?
Not only did you put the anti-termination by yourself later, but you also stated in your thread that it was already not terminatable, so clearly you knew what to do.

I'm done talking to you, I've been trying to be pacifist the whole way, even wished you good luck in that PM I sent you, but you seem to be dramatizing each and every sentence I make.

Edited by Anavrins, 14 December 2015 - 05:36 AM.

[LoganDark]

Dude, I'm sorry. I forgot to add the termination, but thought I added it.

I'm not trying to offend you, I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, I'm just saying you offended me by accident.

I overreact easily...

[Anavrins]

LoganDark, on 14 December 2015 - 03:52 AM, said:

you chose to offend me...

LoganDark, on 14 December 2015 - 06:58 AM, said:

you offended me by accident.

I'm not sure anymore...

But anyways, the lock looks great now
About sha512, nobody has implemented it in CC yet, and sha256 is just as secure.
It's also much slower than sha256.

Edited by Anavrins, 14 December 2015 - 08:02 AM.

[LoganDark]

Anavrins, on 14 December 2015 - 07:58 AM, said:

I'm not sure anymore...

I'm sorry.

[LoganDark]

No feedback?

[LDDestroier]

Just tested it on an advanced computer. I think the only gripe I can make about it is that it's unpolished. It functions exactly as it should, but I feel it looks a bit bare. Also, it would be a bit better if you shortened the sleep() calls after a successful password entry.

Oh, and in MY password lock, you can have multiple passwords by doing string.find() on the whole password file, where each password is separated by a newline! Like, in case you have your super secret password used on that lock and you don't want your roommate to know it.

amnt = 10 --amount of 'heh's
write("Nyeh ") --header. not counted in amnt
for a = 1, amnt do
	write("heh")
	if a ~= amnt then --to make sure that there is proper spacing
		write(" ")
	else
		write("!!!!") --end punctuation
	end
end

Edited by LDDestroier, 05 January 2016 - 12:09 AM.

[LoganDark]

I'm going to try adding compatibility for multiple passwords.

I'm going to try recoding the entire thing.

Edited by LoganDark, 08 January 2016 - 09:40 PM.

[Anavrins]

http://pastebin.com/qKcNunWN
Is this a backdoor I see at line 262?

Anavrins, on 07 December 2015 - 04:59 AM, said:

The startup file also runs a pastebin link, which you can edit, and possibly replace with a virus or backdoor.

Edited by Anavrins, 13 January 2016 - 07:54 PM.

[Luca_S]

Anavrins, on 13 January 2016 - 07:51 PM, said:

http://pastebin.com/qKcNunWN
Is this a backdoor I see at line 262?

Anavrins, on 07 December 2015 - 04:59 AM, said:

The startup file also runs a pastebin link, which you can edit, and possibly replace with a virus or backdoor.

Yes it is.

[Dragon53535]

Now just about no one will probably be using your code if they know that you have a way into their computer if you so desire. There is no POSSIBLE reason why someone would use your code if they're gonna be in the same server as you. The ability to unlock a 'secure' lock with a backdoor is contradictory towards the point of the lock in the first place. More than likely, in your code's current state, you'll probably be getting just about 0 downloads of your code for an actual use.

Most people would look elsewhere on the forums to find a more secure lock. I mean hell, I made one a long time ago, was just a door lock really, sha256, multiple users. Wasn't hard to implement, however I never decided to put in a back door because why do it. There is literally no reason for you to have a back door into a program that you're not going to run yourself.

If someone were to figure out your "super secret password" your lock would be finished, that person wouldn't have to disclose that they knew it, AND they'd be able to get into anyone's computer that uses your lock.

Knowing what the hash result is, it wouldn't take me long to write up a brute force. Probably wouldn't take it long to figure it out too.

Edited by Dragon53535, 13 January 2016 - 08:52 PM.

[LoganDark]

It's for debugging. I added that in recently to combat the problem of bugs. If someone found a bug with their password but won't tell me, I need a way in without bugging them. If someone forgot their password I'd need a way in as well.

I'll put up a poll.

Edit: Reply stating your opinion, and I'll consider removing it.

Edit 2: You have a good point, I'll remove it immediately

Luckily, all affected computers can be restarted to apply the change. Now do you understand why I made the loader load from pastebin?

Edited by LoganDark, 14 January 2016 - 12:30 AM.

[LoganDark]

Dragon53535, on 13 January 2016 - 08:36 PM, said:

-snip-

Knowing what the hash result is, it wouldn't take me long to write up a brute force. Probably wouldn't take it long to figure it out too.

You don't know how long that is.

LoganDarkthisisalongpassword

Crappy password but without logic, very hard to crack

[Famous5000]

Surprisingly enough, I happen to be in very close contact with him. I'll make sure he removes it, and it DOES get annoying because he managed to use it to hack into my computer about 100 times, EVEN when I told him not to. Naughty naughty...

EDIT: I realized that he removed the secret password that he told me, so there should be no reason to be able to hack into the computers I use.

BEFORE you use this comment against him, read the spoiler below:

Spoiler

You cannot use this as a thing against him, he was playing a practical joke, even after I asked him not to, and that's what friends do.

Edited by Famous5000, 14 January 2016 - 12:49 AM.

[LoganDark]

Edited by LoganDark, 14 January 2016 - 12:43 AM.

[LDDestroier]

Here's a good test to see if a lock is good: see if you can lock yourself out completely.

[LoganDark]

Sorry, content creeper'd

Edited by LoganDark, 04 March 2016 - 08:00 PM.

[Famous5000]

Sorry, content creeper'd

Edited by Famous5000, 14 January 2016 - 01:09 AM.

[LoganDark]

Sorry, content creeper'd

Edited by LoganDark, 14 January 2016 - 01:10 AM.

[Famous5000]

LoganDark, on 14 January 2016 - 01:03 AM, said:

Sorry, content creeper'd

Do'h. Failed.

Edited by Famous5000, 14 January 2016 - 01:11 AM.

[Anavrins]

Famous5000, on 14 January 2016 - 12:35 AM, said:

You cannot use this as a thing against him, he was playing a practical joke, even after I asked him not to, and that's what friends do.

A practical joke which is also practical for actually bypassing, for malicious intent, even though it's not his goal.
What he could've done is send you a private version instead of the public one.

But hey, can't blame me, I warned you about it since my first post.

Anavrins, on 07 December 2015 - 04:59 AM, said:

The startup file also runs a pastebin link, which you can edit, and possibly replace with a virus or backdoor.

Edited by Anavrins, 14 January 2016 - 01:26 AM.