[V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
#21
Posted 22 March 2016 - 05:23 PM
#24
Posted 22 March 2016 - 07:25 PM
ry00000, on 22 March 2016 - 05:23 PM, said:
Please choose one of these 3 Passwords:
1. lolcatzwillruletheworld
2. mypasswordissolongitisuncrackable
3. ihavenoideawhattowritehere
And tell me the sha256 hash of it. I bet I can crack it in 5 seconds.
#25
Posted 22 March 2016 - 08:21 PM
ry00000, on 22 March 2016 - 05:23 PM, said:
Well, you said SHA. There's a reason MD5 hasn't been used for passwords for several years at this point...
#26
Posted 23 March 2016 - 08:39 AM
LoganDark, on 17 March 2016 - 07:32 AM, said:
You don't actually need the sleep at 248.
Edited by Luca_S, 23 March 2016 - 08:44 AM.
#27
Posted 24 March 2016 - 06:32 AM
Luca_S, on 23 March 2016 - 08:39 AM, said:
LoganDark, on 17 March 2016 - 07:32 AM, said:
You don't actually need the sleep at 248.
#28
Posted 29 March 2016 - 02:58 PM
To view comments for the most recent version of my system, click here.
Edited by LoganDark, 17 May 2016 - 08:18 PM.
#29
Posted 29 March 2016 - 04:39 PM
#31
Posted 29 March 2016 - 06:16 PM
Looks nice and simple, the only comments I have is about the SHA2 code, you can make the whole process faster by
using my implementation of it, however if you want to stick with GravScore's one, I'd suggest fixing the bug I mentioned in his thread
Edited by Anavrins, 29 March 2016 - 06:17 PM.
#33
Posted 29 March 2016 - 06:34 PM
Anavrins, on 29 March 2016 - 06:16 PM, said:
Looks nice and simple, the only comments I have is about the SHA2 code, you can make the whole process faster by
using my implementation of it, however if you want to stick with GravScore's one, I'd suggest fixing the bug I mentioned in his thread
Edit: Wanna know a cool fact? The salting seed (that seemingly random jumble of letters and numbers) is the full alphabet in uppercase and lowercase, scrambled beyond recognition with 1234567890 salt (get it? nvm) on top.
Edited by LoganDark, 29 March 2016 - 06:45 PM.
#34
#35
#36
Posted 05 April 2016 - 06:07 PM
LoganDark, on 05 April 2016 - 05:30 PM, said:
Example, most CC locks are good, but you can't make a password reminder thing without giving away some security, Krist's addresses are robust, but you'll loose everything if you forget your pwd, no password recovery either.
Edited by Anavrins, 05 April 2016 - 06:08 PM.
#37
Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:43 PM
Anavrins, on 05 April 2016 - 06:07 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 05 April 2016 - 05:30 PM, said:
Example, most CC locks are good, but you can't make a password reminder thing without giving away some security, Krist's addresses are robust, but you'll loose everything if you forget your pwd, no password recovery either.
LoganDark, on 05 April 2016 - 05:30 PM, said:
#38
Posted 05 April 2016 - 09:08 PM
LoganDark, on 05 April 2016 - 05:30 PM, said:
What I meant is that there's a trade-off for user conveniences in exchange of security, such as password recovery, security questions.
The visuals of a program has nothing to do with the security of it.
tl;dr, It's e-a-s-y to have both looks and security, not so much if you want a password recovery mechanism.
Edited by Anavrins, 05 April 2016 - 09:19 PM.
#39
Posted 05 April 2016 - 09:59 PM
Anavrins, on 05 April 2016 - 09:08 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 05 April 2016 - 05:30 PM, said:
What I meant is that there's a trade-off for user conveniences in exchange of security, such as password recovery, security questions.
The visuals of a program has nothing to do with the security of it.
tl;dr, It's e-a-s-y to have both looks and security, not so much if you want a password recovery mechanism.
I get that, but the problem is if you're not making it yourself you can't find a good lock. Basically, if you search for one that just looks good, you'll find one that does NOT block termination and stores the password in plaintext. If you search for one with security, you will find mine (). I'm trying to focus on security while not distracting the user with all this prettyness.
#40
Posted 05 April 2016 - 11:51 PM
Edited by Anavrins, 05 April 2016 - 11:54 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users