Jump to content




[Results in!] CCJam 2016


203 replies to this topic

#181 CrazedProgrammer

  • Members
  • 495 posts
  • LocationWageningen, The Netherlands

Posted 06 July 2016 - 03:29 PM

View PostFoxData, on 06 July 2016 - 03:28 PM, said:

What does DNF mean?
Did Not Finish.
Next time use Google :P/>

View Postjv110, on 06 July 2016 - 05:57 AM, said:

My best theory on why the judging is taking long is that they're still testing SolidEngine :P/>
lol

#182 LDDestroier

  • Members
  • 1,095 posts
  • LocationACDC Town

Posted 07 July 2016 - 02:06 AM

What server are the judges judging the programs on? Is it on a server?? And can we watch the judging?

#183 oeed

    Oversimplifier

  • Members
  • 2,095 posts
  • LocationAuckland, New Zealand

Posted 07 July 2016 - 04:38 AM

View PostEldidiStroyrr, on 07 July 2016 - 02:06 AM, said:

What server are the judges judging the programs on? Is it on a server?? And can we watch the judging?

No it's just in single player. Due to timezone differences, people having stuff to do and the huge number of entires it'd just be impossible to coordinate that.

#184 oeed

    Oversimplifier

  • Members
  • 2,095 posts
  • LocationAuckland, New Zealand

Posted 07 July 2016 - 05:26 AM

Just as a reference for the next CCJam, I'd like to propose the following rules to make judging quicker and easier. One of the main reasons that judging is taking so long is that the vast majority of programs haveno instructions as to how to use it which is incredibly frustrating when there are a dozen of them.
  • All programs MUST have a description and instructions on the GitHub readme. Without these they will not be judged. Half the time I had no idea what the program was meant to do or how to get it to do anything.
  • All programs MUST be uploaded to a GitHub repo.
  • Bug fixed should be committed directly to master, not to other branches, or it should be make very clear in the readme where the latest version is.
  • All libraries should come with demos. Judges will not (unless they really want to) create their own programs with it to test.
In essence, you should make it as easy as possible for us to judge your program. With 18 entries we can't be spending an hour trying to get each program working. Quite honestly, if I haven't been able to get a program working in the first 5 minutes I simply don't bother judging it. We shouldn't have to chase you up to figure out how to use it.

Saying something once in a post or on Gitter does not mean that the judges saw it. Everything should be contained in the repo.

Edited by oeed, 07 July 2016 - 05:28 AM.


#185 CrazedProgrammer

  • Members
  • 495 posts
  • LocationWageningen, The Netherlands

Posted 07 July 2016 - 01:43 PM

Those are some good guidelines Oeed.
I feel a bit bad for the judges.
Can the README.md link to the forum topic of the project like I did?

#186 Lemmmy

  • Members
  • 218 posts

Posted 07 July 2016 - 03:50 PM

excellent guidelines oeed, they seem appropriate for all future ccjam's imo

View PostCrazedProgrammer, on 07 July 2016 - 01:43 PM, said:

Can the README.md link to the forum topic of the project like I did?

should be ok

#187 LDDestroier

  • Members
  • 1,095 posts
  • LocationACDC Town

Posted 10 July 2016 - 09:06 PM

Duuuuudes, when is the judging going to be finished? I wanna see how much praise jamROGUE gets!

#188 Lemmmy

  • Members
  • 218 posts

Posted 13 July 2016 - 03:57 PM

is jamrogue epic

#189 CrazedProgrammer

  • Members
  • 495 posts
  • LocationWageningen, The Netherlands

Posted 13 July 2016 - 05:28 PM

View PostLemmmy, on 13 July 2016 - 03:57 PM, said:

is jamrogue epic
Yes it is, and very fun to hack.

But the judges really need to hurry up.

#190 TheRockettek

  • Members
  • 547 posts
  • LocationRem is best girl

Posted 25 July 2016 - 08:03 AM

View PostCrazedProgrammer, on 13 July 2016 - 05:28 PM, said:

But the judges really need to hurry up.


#191 oeed

    Oversimplifier

  • Members
  • 2,095 posts
  • LocationAuckland, New Zealand

Posted 25 July 2016 - 09:43 AM

View PostTheRockettek, on 25 July 2016 - 08:03 AM, said:

View PostCrazedProgrammer, on 13 July 2016 - 05:28 PM, said:

But the judges really need to hurry up.

Yes it's been way too long, next time we're going to need to entirely change the way judging works.

The single thing were waiting on is one judge on one program they couldn't really get working, with luck it'll be in the next 24 - 48 hours.

#192 TheRockettek

  • Members
  • 547 posts
  • LocationRem is best girl

Posted 26 July 2016 - 09:25 PM

Wut program ;P

#193 apemanzilla

  • Members
  • 1,421 posts

Posted 30 July 2016 - 04:26 AM

Results are up! http://ccjam.ceriat.net/?event=2016

#194 3d6

  • Members
  • 335 posts

Posted 30 July 2016 - 04:29 AM

Thank you to everyone who participated, and I hope you'll all join us again next year!

#195 jv110

  • Members
  • 108 posts
  • LocationIn front of my PC

Posted 30 July 2016 - 06:06 PM

Nice to see you liked my API :)

#196 The Logo Maker

  • Members
  • 83 posts
  • Locationyes

Posted 30 July 2016 - 06:22 PM

very done well . congratulating to the winner and medal !

#197 LDDestroier

  • Members
  • 1,095 posts
  • LocationACDC Town

Posted 30 July 2016 - 06:41 PM

CONGLATURATION !!!
YOU HAVE COMPETED IN
A GREAT CONTEST.
AND PROOVED THE JUSTICE
OF OUR CULTURE.

NOW GO AND REST OUR HEROS !

#198 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 542 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 31 July 2016 - 02:08 PM

Just had a look at some of the winners, I loved them! Congratulations to everyone who took part.
Especially loved the ammount of programs using the new drawing characters to amazing effect, I was worried nobody would bother using them when I added them :P

#199 TheRockettek

  • Members
  • 547 posts
  • LocationRem is best girl

Posted 31 July 2016 - 02:49 PM

:/ i knew lemmmy was going to win from the beggining

#200 Lego Stax

  • Members
  • 136 posts
  • LocationThe dark depths of the web

Posted 31 July 2016 - 03:15 PM

Congratulations to all of the winners and everyone who participated! The programs made for this competition are really creative and awesome!

I think I can speak for all of us when I say we look forward to next year's competition. Thank you to everyone involved for making it possible!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users