Jump to content




ComputerCraft 1.80 Beta Information (Minecraft 1.9.4)


33 replies to this topic

#1 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 541 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:37 PM

Hey everyone, Welcome to the Beta Testing thread for ComputerCraft and ComputerCraftEdu 1.80!
Please test every feature you can think of, and file bug reports for every bug that you find. I'm using GitHub for bug reports, please read below for more info.

Download Requires Forge, and Minecraft version 1.9.4. Please do not test or report bugs in any other version of Minecraft. The intent is to produce a stable version for Minecraft 1.9.4, and then to update for Minecraft 1.10

Changelog
  • Ported ComputerCraft to Minecraft 1.9.4
Bug Reports

I know for a fact that there are many bugs in this version. The intention of this Beta Test is the catalogue them so I don't have to spend as much time myself testing. So please: report any bugs that you find on GitHub. Please tag each bug report with the exact version of ComputerCraft you found the bug in.

As always, please include screenshots or crash logs with your report if applicable. Bugs already present in previous versions of ComputerCraft are valid to report, as long as they have not already been reported.

Happy testing!

#2 Lupus590

  • Members
  • 1,564 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:46 PM

your changelog looks like it has a copy-paste error in it

you've fixed it

Edited by Lupus590, 27 June 2016 - 05:37 PM.


#3 senseidragon

  • New Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:47 PM

The link also currently seems inactive.

#4 vico

  • Members
  • 60 posts
  • Location-

Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:05 PM

View PostLupus590, on 27 June 2016 - 03:46 PM, said:

your changelog looks like it has a copy-paste error in it

Yep. The jar seems to be removed from Curse too.

#5 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 541 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:15 PM

Fixed the changelog in the typo. The download will work once CurseForge approve the file, doesn't usually take very long

#6 Lupus590

  • Members
  • 1,564 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 27 June 2016 - 05:38 PM

View Postdan200, on 27 June 2016 - 04:15 PM, said:

Fixed the changelog in the typo.

not intending to be a critic, but shouldn't that be "Fixed the typo in the changelog"?

#7 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 541 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 27 June 2016 - 05:49 PM

View PostLupus590, on 27 June 2016 - 05:38 PM, said:

View Postdan200, on 27 June 2016 - 04:15 PM, said:

Fixed the changelog in the typo.

not intending to be a critic, but shouldn't that be "Fixed the typo in the changelog"?

That was a typo too, but it seemed apt to leave it unchanged ;)

#8 eniallator

  • Members
  • 53 posts

Posted 27 June 2016 - 08:18 PM

It seems like you can just walk through all of the blocks (i've just tried it for turtles, disk drives, and computers).

Are the item icons for the blocks/items meant to be 2D instead of 3D? also when you hold the blocks that can be placed, they are 3D but they seem to be held at a weird angle. When you hold the items, its just them at a weird angle - no clue if this is intentional or not and i guess it kinda suits the pocket computers since you would be looking at the display of them but im not sure about the floppy disks - which by the way are all white, even if you try to dye them. The turtle item entity is unusually big aswell.

The turtles have a larger hitbox, about the size of 1 block (or bigger since i can't see the hitbox line for the face that has a block on it). When trying to do the equip/unequip programs in the turtle, the turtle needs a block update (not sure if it needs a block update since exiting the GUI and then reopening/exiting it will render the item on the turtle) to render the item that's been equipped/unequipped (e.g digging/placing a block with the turtle) however crafting it with the item is fine.

#9 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 541 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 27 June 2016 - 09:13 PM

As stated in the OP, please report bugs on the GitHub page, not here.

#10 eniallator

  • Members
  • 53 posts

Posted 27 June 2016 - 09:31 PM

View Postdan200, on 27 June 2016 - 09:13 PM, said:

As stated in the OP, please report bugs on the GitHub page, not here.
i thought since there was so many minor bugs that it would be just spam the bug tracker (since its a beta version) so i thought it was better to just put them all in the one post rather than spam it :P

#11 Wojbie

  • Members
  • 602 posts
  • LocationKinda lost

Posted 27 June 2016 - 09:34 PM

View Posteniallator, on 27 June 2016 - 09:31 PM, said:

View Postdan200, on 27 June 2016 - 09:13 PM, said:

As stated in the OP, please report bugs on the GitHub page, not here.
i thought since there was so many minor bugs that it would be just spam the bug tracker (since its a beta version) so i thought it was better to just put them all in the one post rather than spam it :P
Its easier to deal with stuff if its listed as one error per line deal in bugtracker. And he probably muted the tracker for now to not deal with tons of new mails.

On side note - Lua code side was almost not changed at all in case people are interested. Only one line in help file was removed.

Edited by Wojbie, 27 June 2016 - 09:34 PM.


#12 dan200

  • Administrators
  • 541 posts
  • LocationCambridge, England

Posted 27 June 2016 - 11:53 PM

View Posteniallator, on 27 June 2016 - 09:31 PM, said:

i thought since there was so many minor bugs that it would be just spam the bug tracker (since its a beta version) so i thought it was better to just put them all in the one post rather than spam it :P

Nah, having them on GitHub means they're all in one place, and it's easier for me to keep track of which ones are fixed/etc. I'm not guaranteed to read everything posted on here. I'll be working through the github list at the weekend.

#13 vico

  • Members
  • 60 posts
  • Location-

Posted 29 June 2016 - 11:45 PM

Just came here to report the compatibility status for 1.10.2 (since LexManos stated both 1.10.x versions load most 1.9.4 mods fine). I don't sure if dan wants to see this kind of reviews on Github due to 1.9.4 being the priority, but knowing Forge will soon discontinue 1.9.x, it would be util anyway;

As I tested, basically CC run fine, the only bugs i encounter was the already-mentioned block transpassing:

Posted Image


... plus a odd inventory icon bug (Is Forge rendering the block texture instead the actual item?)

Posted Image

And of course the VERY BIG drop/on hand (i like it) size of items:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Another issue is when a singleplayer world is rejoined the computers wont boot automatically when i right-click them. I need to break the block and replace them to work. Turtles dont have this behaviour.

Edited by vico, 30 June 2016 - 12:09 AM.


#14 MarcoPolo0306

  • Members
  • 33 posts
  • LocationC:\Windows\System32\hal.dll

Posted 11 September 2016 - 03:57 PM

View Postvico, on 29 June 2016 - 11:45 PM, said:

Just came here to report the compatibility status for 1.10.2 (since LexManos stated both 1.10.x versions load most 1.9.4 mods fine). I don't sure if dan wants to see this kind of reviews on Github due to 1.9.4 being the priority, but knowing Forge will soon discontinue 1.9.x, it would be util anyway;
As I tested, basically CC run fine, the only bugs i encounter was the already-mentioned block transpassing:
Posted Image
... plus a odd inventory icon bug (Is Forge rendering the block texture instead the actual item?)
Posted Image
And of course the VERY BIG drop/on hand (i like it) size of items:
Posted Image
Posted Image
Another issue is when a singleplayer world is rejoined the computers wont boot automatically when i right-click them. I need to break the block and replace them to work. Turtles dont have this behaviour.

My guess about the weird blocks when you hold them is probley the new way Minecraft blocks work with the Dragon head.


#15 gril002

  • Members
  • 38 posts

Posted 18 September 2016 - 05:24 PM

Has there not been any new version or am I just not seeing the newest download link. Becouse all of the bugs are still in the mod..

#16 Bomb Bloke

    Hobbyist Coder

  • Moderators
  • 6,338 posts
  • LocationTasmania (AU)

Posted 19 September 2016 - 08:36 AM

Dan's put some work into pr1, but as yet it's not available for public testing.

#17 Dreossk

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 26 October 2016 - 08:00 PM

Sorry to ask this but is there any ETA for an update? The bug that freezes computers on disconnect/reconnect drastically reduces the mod's benefit since no automation can work correctly.

Thanks!

Edited by Dreossk, 26 October 2016 - 08:01 PM.


#18 Bomb Bloke

    Hobbyist Coder

  • Moderators
  • 6,338 posts
  • LocationTasmania (AU)

Posted 03 November 2016 - 04:22 AM

People are playing MC 1.9.4 already?

#19 apemanzilla

  • Members
  • 1,373 posts

Posted 03 November 2016 - 12:42 PM

View PostBomb Bloke, on 03 November 2016 - 04:22 AM, said:

People are playing MC 1.9.4 already?

People are playing 1.10 already.

#20 Dreossk

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 04 November 2016 - 09:06 PM

Thanks, I'll check out OpenComputers. I understand Dan might be tired of doing this. There is no way I'm downgrading below 1.10

Edited by Dreossk, 04 November 2016 - 10:10 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users