Jump to content




ComputerCraft 1.80 Beta Information (Minecraft 1.9.4)


25 replies to this topic

#21 Dreossk

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 04 November 2016 - 09:06 PM

Thanks, I'll check out OpenComputers. I understand Dan might be tired of doing this. There is no way I'm downgrading below 1.10

Edited by Dreossk, 04 November 2016 - 10:10 PM.


#22 vico

  • Members
  • 42 posts
  • Location-

Posted 04 November 2016 - 10:03 PM

 Bomb Bloke, on 03 November 2016 - 04:22 AM, said:

People are playing MC 1.9.4 already?

Quote

Forge no longer supports 1.7.10 at all (threads about it are locked) and I believe support for 1.8.9 is dwindling. I would recommend updating directly to 1.10.2, the only version that's currently receiving bug fixes and enhancements.
http://www.minecraft...22294#msg222294

Quote

You shouldn't be updating to 1.9, you should be updating to 1.10.2 or at least 1.9.4.
http://www.minecraft...19712#msg219712

Quote

The current version of Minecraft.
Typically it is also custom for us to give leniency for the previous version of Minecraft as well as we fully understand that sometimes mods take a while to update.
However you're asking for support on a version that is TWO YEARS out of date.
There is no more development for it on Forge's end.
There is NO reason modders should be developing for it.
If you as a user decide to use it that's great. But don't expect us to help you with it.
It's a stupid analogy but it's apt. It's like calling up Microsoft and asking for them to fix your windows XP install.
Its not a hard concept, stop being a pain.

So TLDR:
If you use 1.10.2: Feel free to ask questions here
If you don't: Fix your own shit.
http://www.minecraft...15880#msg215880

------------------------------

There are a plenty of reasons. The main can be the need to use an unsupported Forge version to play CC. Want more?

 apemanzilla, on 03 November 2016 - 12:42 PM, said:


I, for one, welcome our new OpenComputers overlords.


The problem to me about OC is the very complex mechanism. We need to craft part by part the computer, plus another API for power. For me its very off-vanilla than CC.

#23 Anavrins

  • Members
  • 721 posts

Posted 04 November 2016 - 10:27 PM

 Dreossk, on 04 November 2016 - 09:06 PM, said:

Thanks, I'll check out OpenComputers. I understand Dan might be tired of doing this. There is no way I'm downgrading below 1.10
Tbh, I don't think it's about Dan being tired of this, but rather about not having the time to dedicate to something that has no monetary revenue, this is why he went to make his new game Redirection.

#24 Bomb Bloke

    Hobbyist Coder

  • Moderators
  • 6,235 posts
  • LocationTasmania (AU)

Posted 05 November 2016 - 12:16 AM

 vico, on 04 November 2016 - 10:03 PM, said:

There are a plenty of reasons. The main can be the need to use an unsupported Forge version to play CC. Want more?

Meh, "unsupported" is not the same thing as "unstable". I've moved past 1.7.10 myself, but I understand why plenty of people haven't, and in many cases, probably won't.

I wasn't being serious with my comment, but then, I didn't think you were being serious with your whining. Dan'll get to updating when he gets to updating. He doesn't owe anyone anything, so there's no point in complaining - letting him know his users want and enjoy his work is one thing, hassling him for it is another.

Edited by Bomb Bloke, 05 November 2016 - 04:36 AM.


#25 TYKUHN2

  • Members
  • 209 posts
  • LocationSomewhere in this dimension... I think.

Posted 05 November 2016 - 03:59 AM

I won't upgrade past 1.8.something because I start personally disliking the changes past that.

#26 houseofkraft

  • Members
  • 127 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 10 December 2016 - 02:16 AM

People are actually playing 1.11 :)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users