Jump to content




[MC 1.7.10] [CC 1.65] Immibis's Peripherals


432 replies to this topic

#421 kyle1elyk

  • New Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 December 2015 - 01:18 AM

I'm having trouble getting a script to run, and I don't see an easy way around my problem. I have encrypted data on a mag-card and encryption works fine as well as decrypting, as long as the ciphered text is valid, but if it isn't then the script ends, even when using pcall, the only clue being it prints the word "missing"

--[[Code Above not shown]]
ee = {os.pullEvent()}
	if ee[1] == "mag_swipe" then
	 key = enc.decodeKey("AES", "RAW:GuR/36KtbYk6/uX6r+SDLw==")
	 if pcall(key.decrypt("AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding", ee[2])) and key.decrypt("AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding", ee[2]) =="randomPassword" then
	  redstone.setBundledOutput("bottom",1)
	  code = 13
--[[Code Below not shown]]

any help?


Edit: Thanks Lyqyd for pointing out the dumb mistake. If anyone wants the full code here's the pastebin: HHxutz1L

Edited by kyle1elyk, 23 December 2015 - 02:57 AM.


#422 Lyqyd

    Lua Liquidator

  • Moderators
  • 8,452 posts

Posted 23 December 2015 - 01:33 AM

You're using pcall wrong. The first argument should be the function you want to pcall, with subsequent arguments being the arguments to pass to that function. Instead, you're calling the function with its arguments and then passing whatever that function returns to pcall, which is almost certainly not going to be a function value.

#423 kyle1elyk

  • New Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 December 2015 - 01:54 AM

View PostLyqyd, on 23 December 2015 - 01:33 AM, said:

You're using pcall wrong. The first argument should be the function you want to pcall, with subsequent arguments being the arguments to pass to that function. Instead, you're calling the function with its arguments and then passing whatever that function returns to pcall, which is almost certainly not going to be a function value.
Alright, thanks. I should of looked into that more instead of posting here.

#424 Chaz

  • Members
  • 33 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 22 January 2016 - 06:36 AM

I only just started giving this addon a proper look, and I absolutely adore the idea of RFID and Mag-Swipe cards - A much more elegant, roleplay-friendly way of making security terminals, compared to the Floppy Disk ID Card system I'd been working on! Almost makes me want to try and make a ComputerCraft-aided adventure/challenge map. Unfortunately I'm having trouble finding much in the way of pre-made modpacks that include this mod, but I'm definitely gonna be playing about with this some more.

Are there any plans to bring Immibis' Peripherals up to 1.8.9/CC 1.78?

#425 immibis

    Lua God

  • Members
  • 1,033 posts
  • LocationWellington, New Zealand

Posted 27 March 2016 - 11:46 PM

View PostChaz, on 22 January 2016 - 06:36 AM, said:

Are there any plans to bring Immibis' Peripherals up to 1.8.9/CC 1.78?

Why would anyone voluntarily use Minecraft 1.8?

Perhaps the situation is different for servers with a handful of small mods, like ComputerCraft-only servers.

#426 ElvishJerricco

  • Members
  • 803 posts

Posted 27 March 2016 - 11:51 PM

View Postimmibis, on 27 March 2016 - 11:46 PM, said:

View PostChaz, on 22 January 2016 - 06:36 AM, said:

Are there any plans to bring Immibis' Peripherals up to 1.8.9/CC 1.78?

Why would anyone voluntarily use Minecraft 1.8?

Perhaps the situation is different for servers with a handful of small mods, like ComputerCraft-only servers.

Minecraft 1.8 has come a looooong way since it came out. With developments in Forge, the API has actually come up to par with 1.7. It's quickly becoming the prominent modding version until 1.9 gets all sorted out.

#427 Communeguy

  • Members
  • 46 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 31 March 2016 - 09:50 PM

Just curious - does anyone know if this works with CC 1.74? I know it was written for 1.65, but I wonder how much that could really be broken by. Obviously this isn't SUPPORTED, but still...

Edited by Communeguy, 31 March 2016 - 10:13 PM.


#428 Lupus590

  • Members
  • 1,966 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 31 March 2016 - 10:40 PM

View PostCommuneguy, on 31 March 2016 - 09:50 PM, said:

Just curious - does anyone know if this works with CC 1.74? I know it was written for 1.65, but I wonder how much that could really be broken by. Obviously this isn't SUPPORTED, but still...

Back up your saves and try it, what's the worst that could happen?

#429 Communeguy

  • Members
  • 46 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 31 March 2016 - 10:47 PM

Fair point... Turns out it does, at least for me, if anyone was curious.

#430 immibis

    Lua God

  • Members
  • 1,033 posts
  • LocationWellington, New Zealand

Posted 25 April 2016 - 03:26 AM

View PostElvishJerricco, on 27 March 2016 - 11:51 PM, said:

View Postimmibis, on 27 March 2016 - 11:46 PM, said:

View PostChaz, on 22 January 2016 - 06:36 AM, said:

Are there any plans to bring Immibis' Peripherals up to 1.8.9/CC 1.78?

Why would anyone voluntarily use Minecraft 1.8?

Perhaps the situation is different for servers with a handful of small mods, like ComputerCraft-only servers.

Minecraft 1.8 has come a looooong way since it came out. With developments in Forge, the API has actually come up to par with 1.7. It's quickly becoming the prominent modding version until 1.9 gets all sorted out.
Well, if you're not sticking to 1.7.10, you should be following the latest version, which is currently 1.9. Since ComputerCraft isn't updated to 1.9 yet I can't update this to 1.9.

Edited by immibis, 25 April 2016 - 03:26 AM.


#431 Lupus590

  • Members
  • 1,966 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 25 April 2016 - 09:08 AM

View Postimmibis, on 25 April 2016 - 03:26 AM, said:

View PostElvishJerricco, on 27 March 2016 - 11:51 PM, said:

View Postimmibis, on 27 March 2016 - 11:46 PM, said:

View PostChaz, on 22 January 2016 - 06:36 AM, said:

Are there any plans to bring Immibis' Peripherals up to 1.8.9/CC 1.78?

Why would anyone voluntarily use Minecraft 1.8?

Perhaps the situation is different for servers with a handful of small mods, like ComputerCraft-only servers.

Minecraft 1.8 has come a looooong way since it came out. With developments in Forge, the API has actually come up to par with 1.7. It's quickly becoming the prominent modding version until 1.9 gets all sorted out.
Well, if you're not sticking to 1.7.10, you should be following the latest version, which is currently 1.9. Since ComputerCraft isn't updated to 1.9 yet I can't update this to 1.9.

I'm not a mod maker, but from what I've heard, updating to 1.9 from 1.8.9 is a very simple process, but 1.7.10 to 1.8.* is not. With this in mind, you may want to get a head start by updating to 1.8.9

I personally don't update until the mods I want to use have been updated, I've only recently switched to 1.8.9 from 1.7.10 and am still waiting for sum mods.

#432 bluemax9

  • New Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 12 July 2016 - 12:18 AM

Hello,
I am new to the peripherals mod and also computercraft and was wondering if anyone could help.
I have this code for an rfid card.
Spoiler
I seem to be getting the error "RFID3:5: Already scanning" . I get this error with every code I have used so far from the forums.
Thanks for any help! :)

#433 _strx

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 02:27 PM

Hello! Is it possible for this to be ported to 1.10.2? Would be much appreciated by all.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users