#81
Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:28 PM
I've fixed the minimzation bug as well as the empty Run Program window bug. If you downloaded via the installer, running the installer again should fetch the new versions of the files.
I'm not really sure when I'll put together better monitor support. Ideally, I'd like to be able to transport windows to other monitors and have them be clickable on them. Some sort of on-screen keyboard may be possible, I suppose. This feature is a long way off at this point. I'm not even sure what a better way of filtering monitor_touch events would be. Obviously, if they occur on a window placed on the monitor, they'd be sent only to that window's process. If they occurred on other areas of the screen, there'd be no good easy way to figure out which process should receive them, so every process gets them.
Thanks for the interest!
#82
Posted 12 September 2013 - 04:51 AM
#83
Posted 12 September 2013 - 10:00 AM
I'm curious as to where improvements could be made by changing the way the code is written. Also, if you have any questions about the code, I'd be glad to answer them.
#84
Posted 12 September 2013 - 11:10 AM
Lyqyd, on 12 September 2013 - 10:00 AM, said:
Maybe you are right. It's was just my opinion. I think that "OOP-style" allows you to order you code by its function in more pretty way than the APIs. And such code would be easier to read of course. But program is not a book, it is for working not reading! And your OS works just great! To be honest you code gave me a lot of ideas about terminal emulator realization in my OS. But I still have some questions about it's interraction with monitors. If I will be able to formulate some question I will write you.
#85
Posted 17 September 2013 - 04:49 AM
#86
Posted 24 September 2013 - 11:37 AM
startup:49: attemp to index ? (a nil value)
Have I done something wrong or?
#87
Posted 24 September 2013 - 12:59 PM
#88
Posted 17 November 2013 - 08:32 AM
#89
Posted 18 November 2013 - 03:57 PM
#90
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:05 PM
How about something like this. You have a login server, which acts like a domain controller of sorts. You can login to LyqydOS with a network un/pw. Then add in a file server, email client, and such.
#91
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:23 PM
logsys, on 17 November 2013 - 08:32 AM, said:
I do plan to eventually have better support for attached peripherals, including monitors. This is pretty far off at this point, though.
Systemater, on 18 November 2013 - 03:57 PM, said:
Thanks! I think.
Timendainum, on 01 December 2013 - 06:05 PM, said:
How about something like this. You have a login server, which acts like a domain controller of sorts. You can login to LyqydOS with a network un/pw. Then add in a file server, email client, and such.
LyqydNet integration is planned, following a vast overhaul of the LyqydNet system that I'm working on right now. User accounts are somewhat unlikely to happen. There isn't really a satisfactory way to achieve filesystem permissions, so I'm unwilling to try to go too far down that road.
#92
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:29 PM
Think integrated email, chat, home drive stored on a fileserver capability.
#93
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:42 PM
#94
Posted 12 December 2013 - 04:26 PM
1. Your GUI is not that good in terms of folder and file explorer. A little change to the GUI and it would get done
2. You would need time to search and think about this
Now it's in your hands to think if this is good enough to make and will make you have a better OS. Have a good time!
#95
Posted 13 December 2013 - 04:05 AM
logsys, on 12 December 2013 - 04:26 PM, said:
Lyqyd's OS isn't really meant to be a fully featured system, it's simply a way of having multiple programs open at once. You could download specific programs to do that.
One of the thing's I'm trying to do with my latest (not yet released) OS, OneOS, is do exactly what you've said. Packing in tons of useful programs, such as a file manager while being able to support multiple programs. Here's a quick screenshot.
#96
Posted 13 December 2013 - 10:52 AM
It is meant to be a fully featured system, I am simply taking my time to make a good foundation to base it on before I try to go for all the shiny stuff.
#97
Posted 14 December 2013 - 10:46 AM
Lyqyd, on 13 December 2013 - 10:52 AM, said:
It is meant to be a fully featured system, I am simply taking my time to make a good foundation to base it on before I try to go for all the shiny stuff.
#99
Posted 14 December 2013 - 01:51 PM
#100
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:14 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users