Windows 8
#1
Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:11 PM
#2
Posted 06 November 2012 - 02:08 PM
#3
Posted 06 November 2012 - 02:09 PM
#4
Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:01 PM
Quote
I'm a Windows user, but won't that incite a commotion?
Oh, and on topic: I haven't tried it yet, and I don't want to.
Anyone hear the saying that every even version of Windows is bad, and that the odd versions are good?
#5
Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:16 PM
It's definitely a "not get"
Really hard learning curve..
Swiping the mouse.
Bleh.. It's just overall terrible.
It's harder than hell to navigate and, as I always say, "You can't swipe a brick."
Windows 8 was made for tablets, IMO it was meant to stay that way.
Touch screens? Windows is just collecting ALLLLLL that money.
App store on Windows, things may be free but it'll wind up costing you tens of hundreds to have fun on the new OS.
Overall rating: .01/10
#6
Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:22 PM
they tried to much to make it online and interactive and its pretty much a windows live machine
and i HATE windows live, you have to pay for every little thing D:
#8
Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:11 PM
Noodle, on 06 November 2012 - 03:16 PM, said:
It's definitely a "not get"
Really hard learning curve..
Swiping the mouse.
Bleh.. It's just overall terrible.
It's harder than hell to navigate and, as I always say, "You can't swipe a brick."
Windows 8 was made for tablets, IMO it was meant to stay that way.
Touch screens? Windows is just collecting ALLLLLL that money.
App store on Windows, things may be free but it'll wind up costing you tens of hundreds to have fun on the new OS.
Overall rating: .01/10
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe some of the features designed for tablet can be disabled if you're using it as a PC. If not, I'm sure I can find a hack for it.
#9
Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:12 PM
While on mouse and keyboard only, I think it is OK as long as you use only Desktop + start screen (without metro apps). Which also makes sense since metro apps are inferior to desktop apps (I don't think I have 22' display to have 3 buttons and 2 lines of text on it at one time).
#11
Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:12 AM
matejdro, on 06 November 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:
While on mouse and keyboard only, I think it is OK as long as you use only Desktop + start screen (without metro apps). Which also makes sense since metro apps are inferior to desktop apps (I don't think I have 22' display to have 3 buttons and 2 lines of text on it at one time).
#12
Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:14 AM
Everyone's too worried they'll lose $40, which isn't the end of the world, and the guy who tried it loves it. Lol, imma screw around at a computer store this weekend. Does any1 know when the $40 sale is over?
#13
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:22 AM
#14
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:35 AM
#15
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:42 AM
#16
Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:27 AM
matejdro, on 07 November 2012 - 08:42 AM, said:
It's based on ram.
If you have shitty ram, Windows 8 won't do good.
Also, @dlcruz129
The one who tested it has a touch screen. Those who use mouse are really going to be pissed.
Again the money..
Touch screen costs more to buy.
$40(Windows 8) + $200+(Screen) = $240+
#17
Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:34 AM
#18
Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:47 AM
In case any of you don't know, windows 8 was made to be backwards compatible with windows 7 by basically including windows 7 with it, your able to go to the windows 7 desktop at any time, so theoretically by owning windows 8 you could never use the windows 8 desktop...
In any case, I am definitely sticking with Windows 7...
#19
Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:47 AM
matejdro, on 07 November 2012 - 10:34 AM, said:
also a good choice for server boxes
#20
Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:53 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











