the OS section
#1
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:43 AM
one example is SecureOS wich uses an outdated bios.lua
and AxBoot wich isnt even an OS, just a bootloader
i dont get why they were posted there in the first place
#2
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:59 AM
#3
Posted 08 December 2012 - 05:05 AM
ZudoHackz, on 08 December 2012 - 04:59 AM, said:
ihome was never put on the wiki
#4
Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:34 AM
And as to why they were posted there in the first place - well I would imagine that the authors were either looking to brag about them or somebody got bored.
#5
Posted 08 December 2012 - 11:37 AM
PixelToast, on 08 December 2012 - 05:05 AM, said:
{{delete}}and someone further blanked the page - which was rather irritating. It was deleted a couple of days back.
Bubba, on 08 December 2012 - 07:34 AM, said:
And as to why they were posted there in the first place - well I would imagine that the authors were either looking to brag about them or somebody got bored.
I understand the usefulness of the wiki, and I personally don't have a problem with people setting up pages for their projects under the OS Category - so long as it's active and fits one of the "generally accepted" community standards. I have yet to review any of the "3rd-Party Content" on the Wiki, as there is volumes of it, but this definitely prompts me to do so in the next few days.
PixelToast, on 08 December 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:
one example is SecureOS wich uses an outdated bios.lua
and AxBoot wich isnt even an OS, just a bootloader
#6
Posted 08 December 2012 - 03:48 PM
AfterLifeLochie, on 08 December 2012 - 11:37 AM, said:
Please? Lets not start this again.
#8
Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:37 PM
Dlcruz129, on 08 December 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
AfterLifeLochie, on 08 December 2012 - 11:37 AM, said:
Please? Lets not start this again.
Edit: After looking through a lot of the pages, there's not much culling actually needed. I will admit, some of the pages are "lacking" of information, but I'll chase up owners of pages (and their projects, if they still exist). Yes, I understand the categorization is kinda... eww, but I'll sort that out now.
Edited by AfterLifeLochie, 09 December 2012 - 12:58 AM.
#9
#10
Posted 09 December 2012 - 10:19 AM
Dlcruz129, on 09 December 2012 - 07:50 AM, said:
Hence my express instruction not to discuss it.
This morning I'm moving most of the "not OS"-es into a "3rd-Party Content" category or something.
#11
Posted 23 December 2012 - 02:28 PM
It'll be useful for beginners and to get a general overlook.
#12
Posted 25 December 2012 - 06:25 PM
#13
Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:47 AM
Lyqyd, on 25 December 2012 - 06:25 PM, said:
#14
Posted 15 March 2013 - 11:38 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users