i think it will be a good idea if rednet had like networking cables
like:
copper like 25mbps with 0.01mbps loss per block
1gbps eathnet like 1gbps with 0.003mbps loss per block
fiber like 10gbps with 0.0001mbps loss per block
more cables for rednet
Started by NoLongerUsed, Mar 29 2012 06:43 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 March 2012 - 06:43 PM
#2
Posted 30 March 2012 - 04:30 PM
I will be happy if they make network hardcoded, and make networking cables and routers. Sending it manually by lua and redstone is pc memory and clock waste. Isnt real pc sends bytes by hardware ?
#3
Posted 04 April 2012 - 07:03 PM
its a good idea to have this,
#4
Posted 28 August 2012 - 07:08 PM
im tinking standed bundled cable should start with 100mbps network (just like 5 twist adsl2)
and should lose 7.5mbps per 1,000 blocks witch is a loss of 0.075mbps per block
but can be bosted with an exchange program
singal rp2 cable 20mbps and same loss
and we should have telephone poles for rual runs
i will post texture for poles soon
please reply dan200
and should lose 7.5mbps per 1,000 blocks witch is a loss of 0.075mbps per block
but can be bosted with an exchange program
singal rp2 cable 20mbps and same loss
and we should have telephone poles for rual runs
i will post texture for poles soon
please reply dan200
#5
Posted 28 August 2012 - 07:41 PM
20mbps? 10 gbps? You plan to sling around multi-gig files between computercraft computers? For the love of all that is blocky, why?
#6
Posted 28 August 2012 - 09:07 PM
ok we could try a dial up syistem
but
i do want it to need exchangers
after a number of blcoks
but
i do want it to need exchangers
after a number of blcoks
#7
Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:16 PM
anyone?
#8
Posted 30 August 2012 - 11:11 PM
your cable speeds are a little high for sending text
#9
Posted 01 September 2012 - 08:42 AM
I doubt anyone created a program in CC that would transfer files at even 1MB/s and you are dreaming at 10GB/s? I even doubt that lua interpeter is fast enough to do this.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











