FoxData, on 01 August 2016 - 08:12 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 01 August 2016 - 08:10 PM, said:
8/8 gr8 m8
10/10 Put that on your office desk
LoganDark's Content
There have been 172 items by LoganDark (Search limited from 10-February 22)
#257192 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
10/10 Put that on your office desk
#257215 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
epic citidity, on 02 August 2016 - 12:07 AM, said:
2/10 just blender no effort
btw I spent days rendering this with cinema 4D studio...
#257190 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
8/8 gr8 m8
#256816 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
epicidity, on 25 July 2016 - 03:08 AM, said:
LoganDark, on 25 July 2016 - 03:05 AM, said:
epicidity, on 25 July 2016 - 03:03 AM, said:
5 out in 10 . not epic
your avatar it is just a font .
your avatar it is just a font .
but it is norwegian epic ?????
i'd expect someone to rate me 8/8 selfish
#256621 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
7/10 too much eldidi
#256619 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
10/10 I made that logo for him 
#256814 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
epicidity, on 25 July 2016 - 03:03 AM, said:
5 out in 10 . not epic
your avatar it is just a font .
your avatar it is just a font .
#257220 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
epic citidity, on 02 August 2016 - 12:49 AM, said:
LoganDark, on 02 August 2016 - 12:16 AM, said:
btw I spent days rendering this with cinema 4D studio...
0/10 its even easier do in c4d . LOL
just mograph text , a few light source , floor / large plane, make floor white and reflective , turn on ambient occlusion also global illumination easy
i will make own copy of it now
first of my problems was the surface turning black after i turned on reflections, i had to use a shader mat i dunno what it was called.
#257222 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
3/10 reasonable but the angle is off, the shadows are barely visible and the reflection is horrible
#257236 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
-1/0©®™
it's copyrighted registered and trademarked so you can't use it©®™
it's copyrighted registered and trademarked so you can't use it©®™
#257278 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
10/10
I think I just started a trend...
I think I just started a trend...
#257226 Rate the Above User's Avatar!
3d6, on 02 August 2016 - 01:13 AM, said:
Why are you guys getting hostile over this? Your avatars look exactly the same sans text
#247724 CCEmuRedux - ComputerCraft Emulator Redux
Creator, on 10 March 2016 - 07:01 AM, said:
LoganDark, on 10 March 2016 - 06:26 AM, said:
Selim, on 29 February 2016 - 04:37 PM, said:
TheOddByte, on 29 February 2016 - 12:23 AM, said:
I've got another request, add a button to the computers that allows you to take a screenshot of the screen and then saves that into a folder.
I second that!
Me too!
The screenshot should be correctly sized, saved to a file and to the clipboard.
I think it should just take a snapshot of the computer screen itself (border excluded) and save it to the desktop, preserving any possibly important data in the clipboard.
#247720 CCEmuRedux - ComputerCraft Emulator Redux
Selim, on 29 February 2016 - 04:37 PM, said:
TheOddByte, on 29 February 2016 - 12:23 AM, said:
I've got another request, add a button to the computers that allows you to take a screenshot of the screen and then saves that into a folder.
I second that!
Me too!
#239805 OmniOS - The OS than can do (almost) anything
Nice! I really like this OS, but there are some catches I don't really like.
#253250 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Dragon53535, on 06 June 2016 - 09:22 PM, said:
Do you also know that you shouldn't try to resalt a password because then that requires you to store a password on disk to resalt it, unless for whatever reason you decide to resalt the hash, which would require you to keep track of two salts in order per user.
No, resalting uses the input from the user (which we know is the correct one because it hashes the same as the stored password when using the old salt) with a new salt to create a new hash which overwrites the previous one. I've tested it and it's currently working.
Edit: I don't know if I should keep the salting functionality at all, because it's stored in the file anyway...
#249110 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Anavrins, on 29 March 2016 - 06:16 PM, said:
That's an interesting approach to salting I gotta say 
/>/>
Looks nice and simple, the only comments I have is about the SHA2 code, you can make the whole process faster by
using my implementation of it, however if you want to stick with GravScore's one, I'd suggest fixing the bug I mentioned in his thread
/>/>Looks nice and simple, the only comments I have is about the SHA2 code, you can make the whole process faster by
using my implementation of it, however if you want to stick with GravScore's one, I'd suggest fixing the bug I mentioned in his thread
Spoiler
Edit: Wanna know a cool fact? The salting seed (that seemingly random jumble of letters and numbers) is the full alphabet in uppercase and lowercase, scrambled beyond recognition with 1234567890 salt (get it? nvm) on top.
#248395 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Minecrosoft, on 17 March 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 17 March 2016 - 06:57 PM, said:
Creator, on 17 March 2016 - 11:22 AM, said:
Better tell the user to press a key.
Like "press any key to continue"?
Yeah, it's quite easy.
<code here>
print("Press any key to continue")
sleep(0.2)--make sure any key press from the state before is up
os.pullEventRaw( "key_up" )
<mode code here>
Uhh, I'm not dumb.
Thanks for your help, but I don't need help unless I ask for it.
ry00000, on 17 March 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 17 March 2016 - 12:58 AM, said:
LDDestroier, on 16 March 2016 - 07:56 PM, said:
Ohh, it uses SHA256! Good LoganDark! I should go change my encrypted lock to use that instead.
Although, IMO it uses too many sleep() calls, and it DOES look a bit too basic for my taste. But it gets the job done, and is indeed much harder to brute-force than your previous one.
Although, IMO it uses too many sleep() calls, and it DOES look a bit too basic for my taste. But it gets the job done, and is indeed much harder to brute-force than your previous one.
Although, brute-forcing would not be hard outside of ComputerCraft, on a real machine, possibly running brute-force as it's OS (lol), with real-world hashing with real good speed.
What are you talking about, too many sleep() calls?
Yanno, I have a system that can crack a non-salted SHA in about 5 seconds.
What makes you think I really care?
#248373 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Creator, on 17 March 2016 - 11:22 AM, said:
Better tell the user to press a key.
Like "press any key to continue"?
#249275 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
[edit: sorry, quoted wrong post]
Funny, I was playing Portal 2.
"HOW'S YOUR DAY, BECAUSE I'M A POTATO!" - GLaDOS pecked by birds.
LDDestroier, on 29 March 2016 - 05:59 PM, said:
Funny, I was playing Portal 2.
"HOW'S YOUR DAY, BECAUSE I'M A POTATO!" - GLaDOS pecked by birds.
#250942 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
moTechPlz, on 21 March 2016 - 03:56 PM, said:
Hi, about the sleep thing, you could do both. Use a timer to wait 2 or 3 seconds or skip when the 'anykey' is pressed.
Edit: post not needed
#252913 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
EldidiStroyrr, on 03 June 2016 - 09:39 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 03 June 2016 - 09:34 PM, said:
EldidiStroyrr, on 03 June 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:
How would that work? I think a cool thing to have is the salt of the password to be a scrabbled version of the password.
No. Having a salt derived from the password would defeat the purpose of the salt, which is to add an extra layer of security.
Why is that? The cracker doesn't know the key, and to use a rainbow table, you need the salt. Maybe I'm missing something?
yes, but if it's derived from the password, the password is already the salt, it just takes a few steps that will always be the same to make the salt.
the purpose of a salt is having another part of the password to calculate
#251231 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Fatal JavaScript error using Mimic.
pbkdf2(data, salt, 1, 64) --# Using 64 because I want to.
#251229 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
Anavrins, on 01 May 2016 - 01:59 AM, said:
It's pretty much that, it needs SHA2 and HMAC to work, it's as compact as it can be.
Okay, thanks.
#252915 [V4.1 COMING!] LoganDark's Password Lock
EldidiStroyrr, on 03 June 2016 - 09:39 PM, said:
LoganDark, on 03 June 2016 - 09:34 PM, said:
EldidiStroyrr, on 03 June 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:
How would that work? I think a cool thing to have is the salt of the password to be a scrabbled version of the password.
No. Having a salt derived from the password would defeat the purpose of the salt, which is to add an extra layer of security.
Why is that? The cracker doesn't know the key, and to use a rainbow table, you need the salt. Maybe I'm missing something?
in other words, the cracker won't need to know the salt, just the rainbow table, because you can calculate the salt from the passwords, ruining the entire purpose of the salt
