InDieTasten, on 29 May 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
I think you should clarify the architecture and processes involved in using Krist, since it's unlike any other crypto-currencies I know.
Transactions aren't confirmed in blocks, as they usually are, are they? At least transactions happen immediately, only checked by your non-decentral hosting site, if at all. Nobody knows. I think Krist would grow a lot more popularity, when people could trust the system. But the system can't be trusted, when no information of it is open to the community.
Transactions are entirely separate from blocks.
I also intend on decentralizing the server as soon as a digital signature algorithm can be implemented in vanilla CC. (I am offering 100,000 KST for a demonstration)
InDieTasten, on 29 May 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
I know that it involves a lot of communication and it's actually not really that possible to do in non-dirty ways via http, but there needs to be more transparency and decentralization of the block chain, which should include transactions.
The entire database is available for download
here. Apemanzilla and I are working on a node.js implementation of Krist that would make everything far more efficient and launch when a DSA is available.
InDieTasten, on 29 May 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
Another idea to implement would then be transaction charges. For example you could limit the amount of transactions allowed in one block. For example 50. When people now want to transfer krist, they pass recipient address, krist amount to recient and krist amount to verifier(miner of the containing block), so that it effectively feeds back to the pool.
This way the open transaction list gets bigger and bigger, and the miners can always pick the 50 transactions with the most revenue for them.
I think it would be ideal to keep transactions inexpensive. We can incentivize transaction inclusion some other way, like including them in a new kind of DNS block or something, which is mined to KST blocks.
InDieTasten, on 29 May 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
So the check of the system and the block chain including all transactions is done collaboratively.
Then you just need to handle the exchange of blocks and open transactions, without having to deal with any checks what so ever, leading to faster response times of your site. I already mined 2 blocks that were mined already by another miner.
That's the long term goal
InDieTasten, on 30 May 2015 - 09:16 AM, said:
Wow, I've mined over night, and theres something strange happening:

Look at the times a got a block, and now watch my transactions:

So what happened to those blocks????! I mined all night long, mining blocks around 600~ Krist worth and got a single block transferred. I hope I will get these transactions soon, otherwise I no longer see any point of this currency being existent anymore.
Edit: my local timezone is CET, just to help you find these errors.
You spelled your address wrong in one or more of your miners.
Yevano, on 30 May 2015 - 01:22 PM, said:
fishermedders, on 30 May 2015 - 12:43 PM, said:
Can anyone help me with my problem? I'm running Yevano's miner (Congrats, BTW!) on Ubuntu and getting ~1.7 mh/s (finally over .5)

. Ive solved 8 blocks overnight (meh) and I haven't been credited for any of the blocks that I have solved :? Help anyone? I currently have 373 KST and I'm running ubuntu 14.04 on a Dell xps 420
Thanks in advance
fisher
Mind sending your krist address as well as the arguments you gave the miner? If you give it the wrong address, the krist will basically just become lost unfortunately.
The most probable cause is someone else submitting the block before you can. Some more information would be nice
Sandstorm, on 30 May 2015 - 03:18 PM, said:
Okay thank you, I think my balance appears ot be broken or something. The miner I have running indicates I have solved a block, however I didn't receive any KST according to the miner. I then opened up KWallet to find that my balance field contained an error, only my transactions show the KST being mined.
?getbalance is broken due to a clerical error. I'll fix it as soon as I get home
Mayushii, on 30 May 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
Quote
I thought he would read the posts in here by itself...
As stated by me repetitively, Krist needs a major update, or another system will take it over. The problems with the security are stacking higher and higher and with the single point of failure(coss itself) failing - and as it looks to me not even reading this - I can't see a future in which Krist will be an in-game currency long-term :/
With a topic with 26 pages, sometimes you tend to skim through the replies instead of taking the time to read every individual post, so I suggested PM'ing directly.
I do read everything eventually
Mayushii, on 30 May 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
Honestly, this is just a fun concept from my point of view. To become any serious attempt at a currency, it needs complete decentralization, some bug fixes, and maybe a better mining system. (From what I've seen, every block is attempted by every computer, so first one to 'win' gets the rewards, correct me if I'm wrong though!)
Well, I want Krist to be a stake in the CC community - not some bitcoin exchange. I don't want it to be a "serious" traded currency, I want it to be fun and valuable in our sphere. Nonetheless, decentralization and optimization are planned.
And you aren't wrong, mining is a race!
Mayushii, on 30 May 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
From a security standpoint, I would probably never consider putting actual money value into it; also, if it is used as a currency system, you know how every major cryptocurrency works:
First one to adopt it will be "rich". Being as that is, would give the currency a major imbalance and can be abused on servers, just because someone spent the time to mine it first.
You can clearly see the results of this when looking into the top balances. (I would have a screenshot, but it appears I error out when trying to run the wallet.)
I'm not too worried about that. If it becomes a problem, we can theoretically schedule more mining.
luker2009, on 30 May 2015 - 07:24 PM, said:
Atenefyr, on 30 May 2015 - 05:58 PM, said:
Mayushii, on 30 May 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
With a topic with 26 pages
..or now 27
Mayushii, on 30 May 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
(I would have a screenshot, but it appears I error out when trying to run the wallet.)
What ComputerCraft version are you running it on?
It's probably erroring because
http://ceriat.net/kr...lance=<address> is returning 'nil' right now.
My fault! I will fix this as soon as I get home! I just deprecated a ton of now-useless calls and that one got messed up by mistake.